Talk:Ashton, Stalybridge and Liverpool Junction Railway

Untitled
I can see little justification for this railway having a separate article. It was only in existence for less than three years; it then became part of the M&LR - which does not have an article, since the existing one, for no apparent reason that I can see, was moved to become the L&YR!!!! - which then became part of the L&YR. The L&YR was itself the amalgamation of a large number of constituent railways, only one of which was the AS&LJR. I am sure that the majority of the others do without an article - so why this one? Peter Shearan 11:48, 5 May 2005 (UTC)


 * The AS&LJR was an important line, forming part of the present day principal line between Manchester and Leeds. A number of things have changed since the above commentary was written: the M&LR does have its own article. Contrary to the assertion above, the AS&LJR didn't become part of the M&LR. In 1847 the L&YR was formed from two existing railways, the M&LR and this one; a third constituent was under construction and had not been opened. Afterbrunel (talk) 12:33, 14 February 2020 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ashton, Stalybridge and Liverpool Junction Railway. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050410094226/http://www.railwayancestors.fsnet.co.uk/research.html to http://www.railwayancestors.fsnet.co.uk/research.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 13:34, 10 July 2017 (UTC)