Talk:Ashur-dan III/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Cerebellum (talk · contribs) 13:12, 12 January 2022 (UTC)

Hey I'll review this one as well, probably tomorrow. --Cerebellum (talk) 13:12, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Nevermind! Review was straightforward and similar to Shalmaneser IV, pass. --Cerebellum (talk) 16:22, 12 January 2022 (UTC)

Criteria

 * Prose: Article is well written and complies with the MOS. I did some light copy editing, feel free to revert if you disagree with the changes.
 * References: Article is thoroughly referenced to high-quality modern sources.
 * Coverage: Yes, article seems to cover what is known about this king's reign in an appropriate level of detail, you didn't add extra background info just to pad the article length.
 * Neutral: Yes.
 * Stable: Yes.
 * Illustrated: No, I don't think illustrations are necessary. --Cerebellum (talk) 16:22, 12 January 2022 (UTC)