Talk:Asperger syndrome and neuroscience

Contested deletion
Look at Asperger syndrome, especially the genetics portion (which is out of date). We need to move towards WP:SUMMARY here. There's enough material here to justify a dedicated page on just "the science of asperger syndrome" --HectorMoffet (talk) 13:26, 21 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Lots more to add, I intent to expand greatly on the subject-- but I do want to make sure it doesn't just get deleted.   --HectorMoffet (talk) 14:01, 21 October 2012 (UTC)
 * It seems to me that this should be merged into the article on the syndrome itself. Toccata quarta (talk) 14:46, 21 October 2012 (UTC)
 * I think a summary should be merged into the main article, but this level of biochemical detail and tech jargon belongs in a specialized article. --HectorMoffet (talk) 08:07, 22 October 2012 (UTC)


 * There is already a fairly big aricle on Epigenetics of autism, so only Asperger syndrome needs to be here, or a summary from that article. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:48, 22 October 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned references in Asperger syndrome and neuroscience
I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Asperger syndrome and neuroscience's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "EhlGill": From History of Asperger syndrome:  From Asperger syndrome:  

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:26, 5 December 2012 (UTC)