Talk:Aspropaxillus giganteus/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Rcej (Robert) - talk 06:21, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

Another floral-looker. For now; in Similar species, clarify "...and the adnate to slightly adnexed gill attachment."-- Rcej (Robert) - talk 06:21, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Alright, I have linked and parenthetically defined the technical terms. Sasata (talk) 07:08, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Good. Well... I'm seeing nothing else to really do here. heh.-- Rcej (Robert) - talk 07:18, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

Results of review

 * GA review (see here for criteria)

The article Leucopaxillus giganteus passes this review, and has been upgraded to good article status. The article is found by the reviewing editor to be deserving of good article status based on the following criteria:
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail: