Talk:Associated Aviation

Do we really need a separate article about Associated Aviation Flight 361?
The accident is notable, but (for the time being), the story is told in a few sentences. In its current shape, Associated Aviation Flight 361 does not really add anything beyond the information that is already presented here, at the "accidents" section. What are your thoughts and comments?--FoxyOrange (talk) 22:02, 5 October 2013 (UTC)


 * Oppose merger - The accident article should contain more information for example when the result of the accident investigation is known it will be detailed on the Flight 361 page but would only appear as a sentence in the brief summary on this page. MilborneOne (talk) 23:20, 5 October 2013 (UTC)


 * Oppose merger - I agree; it is too early to say the separate article is superfluous. Carbonix (talk) 11:59, 16 October 2013 (UTC)

Suggestion Postpone this discussion until the investigation is complete. We will then be in a better position to make an informed decision as to where the subject matter belongs. 86.5.176.168 (talk) 14:30, 6 October 2013 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Associated Aviation. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100925060836/http://www.flyassociated.com/index_files/Page517.htm to http://www.flyassociated.com/index_files/Page517.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 21:34, 10 July 2017 (UTC)