Talk:Assume the Position with Mr. Wuhl

Stub, really?
The description has enough detail that a stub was highly unwarranted. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.199.204.195 (talk) 01:30, April 5, 2011
 * Please review WP:STUB. This article is well within the definition. In addition, your consistent removal of stub template from numerous articles without explanation may be considered as disruptive.  elektrik SHOOS  02:59, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Hello, different person here. I've read through the above link on stubs as well as the linked Croughton-London rule.  It is my opinion that this is not, under the Croughton-London rule, a stub as there simply isn't much more that can be said about this topic.  If any sort of decision is in consideration, I think that the stub tags should be remove on those grounds. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.124.74.7 (talk) 11:53, May 1, 2013