Talk:Assyrians

Untitled
I think it'd be much simpler to be labeled as Assyrians instead of Assyiran people. It's much easier to reference and more appropriate.


 * Yes by all means! One should be merged into the other - but which title is better of the two? //Big Adamsky 18:45, 27 December 2005 (UTC)

The Cleanup
There has just been a huge cleanup withing the last fifteen minutes: Aramaeans, Assyrians, Chaldeans, and Syriacs now have their own page! I tried putting them all into one page, but it didn't work out too well, but to link them all together, there is a at the bottum of all of the pages. --Domthedude001 18:23, 18 April 2006 (UTC)

Deletion
I'm deleting this page so that I can have Assyrian people moved to Assyrians.


 * The correct way to move a page that needs administrator's assistance is to list it at WP:RM. If you follow the procedure, that should create a voting page for community consensus. --Gareth Hughes 17:20, 28 December 2005 (UTC)


 * If it's likely to be uncontroversial, though, an admin can just go ahead and do it without there being a vote. --Angr (t·c) 19:06, 28 December 2005 (UTC)

Merge?
I propose dealing with the history of the Assyrian people under the article with that name, and possibly transferring paragraphs concering their ancient state to Assyrian Empire. Having a separate entry on ancient Assyrians seems redundant to me. Big Adamsky 19:22, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Good Idea, Go for it! --Domthedude001 18:24, 18 April 2006 (UTC)

I think most of the info on the article is redundant.
I've done some cleaning but wow talk about bias and self glorification of one's race. I belong to it but what the hell.

Disambiguation page
Shouldn't this be a disambiguation page leading to both the Assyrian empire and Assyrian people of today? Funkynusayri 11:41, 1 August 2007 (UTC)