Talk:Aston Cantlow

Renovation costs battle with the Church
Administrators, is it felt that this matter is suitable for a work of encyclopedic nature. A senrtence has ben aded to the article with a link to a national newspaper report of the time. Views became very heated on both sides of the argument of this case and as in most cases I'm not sure the newspaper article covers all of the aspects and options open to both parties at various stages of a lentghy litigation process. I was aware of this case and decided not to mention it as I felt that it is not really the place here to cover the legal arguments in a fair and objective way to both sides. I have not removed the referemnce but thought I would open the argument up and see if a policy existed on this type of entry.Argrogan (talk) 17:58, 21 January 2010 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Aston Cantlow. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120719065753/http://www.chancelrepair.org/2.html to http://www.chancelrepair.org/2.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 01:05, 11 July 2017 (UTC)