Talk:At the Movies (Rugrats)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: J Milburn (talk) 00:36, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * Ok, sounds fine. J Milburn (talk) 20:33, 7 February 2010 (UTC)


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * B. MoS compliance:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources:
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
 * I found the article on a website featuring multiple publications from throughout the country. If I'm not mistaken, it's some kind of print media or other form of publication.  The Flash  {talk} 03:20, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
 * I found the article on a website featuring multiple publications from throughout the country. If I'm not mistaken, it's some kind of print media or other form of publication.  The Flash  {talk} 03:20, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
 * I found the article on a website featuring multiple publications from throughout the country. If I'm not mistaken, it's some kind of print media or other form of publication.  The Flash  {talk} 03:20, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
 * I found the article on a website featuring multiple publications from throughout the country. If I'm not mistaken, it's some kind of print media or other form of publication.  The Flash  {talk} 03:20, 5 February 2010 (UTC)


 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * Unfortunately, that's all there is. Remember, this is an episode of a kids cartoon that aired in 1991.  The Flash  {talk} 03:20, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
 * I accept that, but I would say that that means we are not in a position to make the statement. J Milburn (talk) 20:39, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Alright, done.  The Flash  I am Jack's   complete   lack of surprise 21:40, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
 * I accept that, but I would say that that means we are not in a position to make the statement. J Milburn (talk) 20:39, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Alright, done.  The Flash  I am Jack's   complete   lack of surprise 21:40, 8 February 2010 (UTC)


 * B. Focused:
 * I tried chopping it down a bit, so tell me if it's fine now. How would you like me to adjust the nomination?  The Flash  {talk} 03:20, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
 * The stuff on Reptar is better. I would be inclined to say the video award does not belong in the lead. I would also say that the line "In 2000, it and the other selected episodes featured in Rugrats: Return of Reptar was nominated for Video Software Dealers Association's Home Entertainment Award for "Outstanding Marketing Campaign for a Major Direct-to-Video Release."" (which actually doesn'ty make sense) Should be changed to "In 2000, Rugrats: Return of Reptar, on which the episode featured, was nominated for Video Software Dealers Association's Home Entertainment Award for "Outstanding Marketing Campaign for a Major Direct-to-Video Release." or something similar. The current wording makes it sound like it is the episodes winning the award, rather than the video. J Milburn (talk) 20:38, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Alright, done.  The Flash  I am Jack's   complete   lack of surprise 19:58, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Alright, done.  The Flash  I am Jack's   complete   lack of surprise 19:58, 12 February 2010 (UTC)


 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * Still, I believe it helps give a visual reference to something that is possibly unvisable by certain readers who have never seen neither the episode nor Care Bears.  The Flash  {talk} 03:20, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Perhaps, but does that point really need to be made? The issue is more a point of interest than central to the episode. I'm really not convinced the images meet non-free content criterion 8. J Milburn (talk) 20:40, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Okay, replaced it with a free-use image.  The Flash  I am Jack's   complete   lack of surprise 19:58, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Still, I believe it helps give a visual reference to something that is possibly unvisable by certain readers who have never seen neither the episode nor Care Bears.  The Flash  {talk} 03:20, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Perhaps, but does that point really need to be made? The issue is more a point of interest than central to the episode. I'm really not convinced the images meet non-free content criterion 8. J Milburn (talk) 20:40, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Okay, replaced it with a free-use image.  The Flash  I am Jack's   complete   lack of surprise 19:58, 12 February 2010 (UTC)


 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Pass or Fail:


 * Link character names to character lists?
 * All characters are linked to either their page or the list.  The Flash  I am Jack's   complete   lack of surprise 17:12, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
 * "Didi and Stu" in the lead; links there would be good. J Milburn (talk) 20:44, 7 February 2010 (UTC)


 * "Reptar! He" Full stop after "!"?
 * Yep, the movie is called Reptar with an exclamation point.  The Flash  I am Jack's   complete   lack of surprise 17:12, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Yeah, so we need a full stop after the "!", I believe. Just as you wouldn't finish a sentence as U.S. without an additional full stop. J Milburn (talk) 20:44, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
 * I think I'm misunderstanding what you mean by "full stop" then, lol. Do you think you can fix this one?  The Flash  I am Jack's   complete   lack of surprise 19:58, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Sorry, yes- you'll probably know it as a period :) J Milburn (talk) 00:56, 14 February 2010 (UTC)


 * "who getting popcorn" Who is?
 * ✅  The Flash  I am Jack's   complete   lack of surprise 17:12, 7 February 2010 (UTC)


 * "including "Reptar 2010" and" A redlink or a link to an episode list would be good.
 * ✅  The Flash  I am Jack's   complete   lack of surprise 17:12, 7 February 2010 (UTC)


 * "as well as marked the first time" Tense doesn't seem to be quite right here.
 * ✅  The Flash  I am Jack's   complete   lack of surprise 17:12, 7 February 2010 (UTC)


 * "Official Reptar cereal"- could be rephrased.
 * Done when I chopped down the Cultural impact section.  The Flash  I am Jack's   complete   lack of surprise 17:12, 7 February 2010 (UTC)


 * Post is a dablink
 * Removed when I chopped down the Cultural impact section.  The Flash  I am Jack's   complete   lack of surprise 17:12, 7 February 2010 (UTC)


 * ""Slumber Party."" Link?
 * There isn't a page for it, and I don't really see the point in linking to a list that's already right below it.  The Flash  I am Jack's   complete   lack of surprise 17:12, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Fair enough. J Milburn (talk) 20:44, 7 February 2010 (UTC)


 * valentines is a dablink, and would more correctly be Valentine's
 * ✅  The Flash  I am Jack's   complete   lack of surprise 17:12, 7 February 2010 (UTC)


 * Is there not a category for Rugrats episodes? Or one for Rugrats generally?
 * ✅  The Flash  I am Jack's   complete   lack of surprise 17:12, 7 February 2010 (UTC)