Talk:Ateapotist

A tag has been placed on Ateapotist, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add  on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself.

If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Earthangelyanie (talk) 22:52, 30 July 2008 (UTC)

Appeal for deletion
This article should not be deleted because it is just like the word 'atheist' a representation of not believing in a certain deity. An analogy coined by the philosopher Bertrand Russell (1872–1970) and also Richard dawkins in most of his talks and this word would be soon the word of mouth in any corner of the streets around the world. I admit this article needs more improvements and eventhough this word is not yet part of the dictionary so far, but I strongly believe that this word has a major play in any theistic argumentations now or in the future. thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Earthangelyanie (talk • contribs)  Dloh  cierekim  23:14, 30 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Resoted. to AFD we go.  Dloh  cierekim  23:14, 30 July 2008 (UTC)

You can't just make up a term, and expect the rest of the world to consider it encyclopedic. See WP:AFD. Llamabr (talk) 03:18, 31 July 2008 (UTC)