Talk:Atellan Farce

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 17:38, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Dillonalln.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 17:38, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): AngRenzi. Peer reviewers: Ee1013, Opalanietet.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 14:55, 16 January 2022 (UTC)

Peer Review
I love the Authorship section as well as the Controversy sections. There was a lot of fascinating material there.

The History section should be more developed. Perhaps that is in the works during a second draft. One possible idea is moving the Commedia del'Arte information to the History section. I would just like to hear more about how Atellan Farce came about, how it was performed, does it effect any performance genre in the current era.

I would also be aware of saying, "Some people" or "Some historians." Is there any historian you're talking about in particular? This is something I believe I need to watch out more myself in my own work.

Wonderful start!

Opalanietet (talk) 19:29, 11 November 2018 (UTC)Opalanietet

Consider deleting Contemporary Comparisons section
I have completed a reasonably thorough copyedit for style, grammar, and clarity. I suggest considering the removal of the Contemporary Comparison section for the following reasons: - is internally redundant. - redundant with previous sections of the article - reference is too broad (pp. 39 - 351) to determine how the reference is being used.

At a minimum, the Contemporary Comparison section will benefit from a rewrite and inclusion of more than SNL and Whose Line is it Anyway for comparative purposes.

Robertnola (talk) 15:03, 18 February 2019 (UTC)

tighten up?
Lede: "imported to Rome in 391 BC" Next section: "originated in Italy 300 BC"

Which is it?

TheNuszAbides (talk) 22:28, 24 April 2019 (UTC)

Image
Fixed the caption, but the image itself seems completely irrelevant to this article: the source just happens to have a paragraph on Appius Claudius following that on Atellan farce.Emelkaji (talk) 17:23, 16 October 2019 (UTC)