Talk:Athelm/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Adam Cuerden (talk · contribs) 21:32, 21 June 2013 (UTC)

Similar to Wulfhelm, this is a very good article on someone who, while notable, has little information available about him.


 * 1. Well written?: Deals well with ambiguity, and covers the interesting aspects that make him notable clearly, despite difficulty.
 * 2. Factually accurate?: Sources look quite good
 * 3. Broad in coverage?: As said above, this article deals well with the conflict between notability and lack of information. It's short, but comprehensive.
 * 4. Neutral point of view?: No issues
 * 5. Article stability?: No issues
 * 6. Images?: Not possible; as explained in the article, no coins exist with him, and I'm quite happy to believe that any other images are either obscure or unavailable. Adam Cuerden (talk) 21:32, 21 June 2013 (UTC)