Talk:Atherton, Greater Manchester/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Pyrotec (talk) 22:27, 17 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Starting review. Pyrotec (talk) 22:27, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

Overall summary
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * B. MoS compliance:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources:
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Pass or Fail:

Another GA-class article. You're getting good at this. Congratulations on the quality. Pyrotec (talk) 12:21, 18 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Thank you very much, can I still eat the cake? It's all thanks to Malleus Fatuorum & Fingerpuppet really, especially MF who was so generous with his time. --J3Mrs (talk) 12:40, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Yes why not have a celebration - better send MF an extra big piece of cake. Pyrotec (talk) 12:50, 18 November 2009 (UTC)