Talk:Atmosphere of the Moon

Untitled
In-suit detectors? Aren't that in-situ detectors you think? --85.82.179.226 (talk) 18:14, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

Yes, they are in situ detectors, not in suit detectors. The reference cited tells us this. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.202.27.30 (talk) 14:21, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

In the body of the "Composition" I added a relevant source of info regarding the status and verification of the Moon's atmosphere, cited from Nasa. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 169.139.19.171 (talk) 20:11, 9 November 2013 (UTC)

composition section
The first paragraph of the composition section is copied word-for-word from the source. Bubba73 You talkin' to me? 13:47, 10 November 2013 (UTC)


 * As noted below, I have removed the text because it is, as you say, copied straight from the NASA source. I think such violations, which are as blatant as this one, should always be removed as soon as they are spotted as they damage the standing of Wikipedia. &mdash; Amakuru (talk) 11:01, 15 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Apologies, I have since discovered that this material is public domain because all NASA material is released as such. I have reinstated the material. Thanks &mdash; Amakuru (talk) 13:32, 15 January 2014 (UTC)

Should the vary large numbers here be expressed in scientific notation? Justin Custer (talk) 12:49, 21 November 2013 (UTC)

I found this other material, but the data is in particles/cm3 instead of atoms/cm3 as it is in the current Wikipedia article. The amount of Hydrogen is highly divergent. --Arthurfragoso (talk) 07:07, 29 June 2017 (UTC)

Copyright problem removed
Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/LADEE/news/lunar-atmosphere.html. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. &mdash; Amakuru (talk) 11:01, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Apologies, I have since discovered that this material is public domain because all NASA material is released as such. I have reinstated the material. Thanks &mdash; Amakuru (talk) 13:32, 15 January 2014 (UTC)

Template not needed
On the 15th of January a how template was added behind a statement in the lead section that the atmosphere "requires constant replenishment". One finds the information in the body of the text in the next section labeled ==Sources==. So the how template is not needed and should be removed. - Fartherred (talk) 22:55, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
 * The removal of the unneeded template has been accomplished by User:Amaurea on the 16th of February. - Fartherred (talk) 17:19, 18 February 2015 (UTC)

Verification needed
I question the verifiability of the following statement: "The solar wind and outgassing are not primary sources of the Earth's atmosphere, or of any stable atmosphere." This statement was added at 11:33 on the 6th of September 2013 with the edit summary being: "reorganized". It could be just the supposition of an editor. If someone can verify the statement, please do. - Fartherred (talk) 01:38, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

Contamination from rocket exhaust
I seem to remember hearing that the Apollo landings temporarily but significantly changed the composition of the Moon's atmosphere due to rocket exhaust? -- Beland (talk) 01:28, 5 August 2016 (UTC)