Talk:Atopy (philosophy)

useless
this article is absolutely useless. it's completely vague and gives no concrete definition, only a bunch of references to examples and concepts that one is left on one's own to connect conceptually. please, someone fix this, it is embarrassing for continental philosophy as a whole. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.171.45.245 (talk) 19:42, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

I don't think the article is absolutely useless. I for one think I understood it—however, perhaps I'm not a philosopher. It's not because it's been improved, because the content hasn't been edited since 2011.

This is completely unrelated, but I also observed that your three sentence comment contains absolutely no capital letters, even thouch you probably live on a continent where English writing is commonly taught as part of education as a whole. This might—conceptually or concretely—fit the definition of embarrassment for your (former?) writing or English teacher. I was vaguely amused myself. Ken K. Smith (a.k.a. Thin Smek) (talk) 14:54, 19 December 2018 (UTC)