Talk:Attock Khurd

Cleaning
I cleaned the page and added the required, proved and available content and citations.John Gell (talk) 10:30, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 one external links on Attock Khurd. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090121124056/http://1911encyclopedia.org:80/Alexander_the_Great to http://www.1911encyclopedia.org/Alexander_the_Great
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090822211436/http://www.1911encyclopedia.org:80/Punjab to http://www.1911encyclopedia.org/Punjab

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 04:03, 21 October 2016 (UTC)

Name
I found the discussion of the meaning of the name very illuminating but perhaps over-long for the lede, although this is where these discussions normally go.

I was inclined to break it into a separate section or to make this discussion into a note, but instead I will leave this as constructive criticism for some other editor with more local/topic knowledge.

Perhaps the lede will expand when the article expands and it won't seem so undue. I am not proposing, and would oppose, deleting this material. Elinruby (talk) 18:59, 11 September 2022 (UTC)

Light ce
Given my profound ignorance of the history, I hesitated to delve into this too far, but there seems to have been much that happened here that could be expanded. Meanwhile, I have confined myself to one language correction, removal of some overlinking, and some minor idiom tweaks. English cares a lot about word order, and where I, a motivated North American reader, had to re-read, I have adjusted it. In particular the original editor seems to have had a fondness for a profusion of subordinate clauses between the subject and the verb. I am leaving the copy-edit flag up because it seems possible that it could benefit from an edit for content. I would encourage anyone interested to expand the history, spinning off a separate article if needed. Elinruby (talk) 19:25, 11 September 2022 (UTC)