Talk:Atucha II Nuclear Power Plant

}}

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 one external links on Atucha II Nuclear Power Plant. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140714210447/http://portalweb.cammesa.com/Pages/GenAtucha.aspx to http://portalweb.cammesa.com/Pages/GenAtucha.aspx
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140715003042/http://www.minplan.gob.ar/noticia/15870/la-central-nuclear-nestor-kirchner-atucha-ii-comenzo-a-generar-energia.html to http://www.minplan.gob.ar/noticia/15870/la-central-nuclear-nestor-kirchner-atucha-ii-comenzo-a-generar-energia.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 04:33, 21 October 2016 (UTC)

Proposed merge with Atucha I Nuclear Power Plant
Athuca is one power plant, with 2 reactors. It should be covered in one article as for all the other nuclear power plant articles. Ita140188 (talk) 05:44, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Agree, as done in spanish wiki: Central_nuclear_Atucha. --Robertiki (talk) 11:12, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
 * We have also a foto with both reactors together. --Robertiki (talk) 11:39, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Name could be Atucha Nuclear Complex with the following heading (translation from spanish wiki):

The Atucha Nuclear Complex is an Argentine atomic complex subdivided into two power plants, both located on the right bank of the Paraná de las Palmas river, 9 km north of the city of Lima, and about 115 km northwest of the city of Buenos Aires.

One of them is the Atucha I (Juan Domingo Perón) nuclear power station (1974), the first nuclear installation in Latin America, which was destined for the production of electrical energy.1 The second is the nuclear power station Atucha II (Néstor Kirchner), Which was built adjacent to the previous one to take advantage of much of its infrastructure.
 * --Robertiki (talk) 12:24, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
 * The articles should be merged into the existing Atucha Nuclear Power Plant in accordance with the naming convention for similar articles.--Ita140188 (talk) 01:06, 27 March 2017 (UTC)

Which convention for similar articles ? Have you some references ? I will explain how I have come to proposing "Atucha Nuclear Complex": - at first (2014) I though that both articles should be merged under Atucha Nuclear Power Plant with two reactors (one name as happens with many nuclear plants) - latter (2015) I realized that officially they are recognized as different entities, with own names (Central Nuclear Juan Domingo Perón and Central Nuclear Néstor Kirchner) and that reactor blocks placed nearby on the same site often get separate identifications, as in Hinkley Point A nuclear power station, Hinkley Point B nuclear power station and Hinkley Point C nuclear power station - next I found the spanish article, which starts the lead with Complejo Nuclear Atucha (albeit not in the title; a pending move ?); at that point I checked if Atucha Nuclear Complex would be an "editor creation", but easily found many sources, starting with the owner]: "It will be built in the Atucha Nuclear Complex, adjacent to the Nuclear Power Plants Néstor Kirchner and Atucha I." The phrase gives also an interesting glimpse: Atucha I is not identificated with the official name, as instead done with the second unit (the have not referred it as Atucha II). Another source, writing about the future Atucha III places it in the Atucha Nuclear Complex. Also the [Chinese] name the site Atucha Nuclear Complex. We find another reputable source at IAEA which write: "... and will be built in Atucha Nuclear Complex in Lima, Buenos Aires." So I am confident with that choice. I admit that there are not many hits (about 380 on Google), but many Google hits on Atucha Nuclear Power Plant are the result of the colloquial mention of a nuclear power plant at the Atucha site which in english would be written "Atucha nuclear power plant" (lower case), as it happens in many sources, as in the caption of this one: "Nucleoelectrica Argentina's Atucha nuclear power plant.", so it is not an explicit naming. --Robertiki (talk) 14:32, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
 * I think the article should be named Atucha Nuclear Power Plant per WP:COMMONNAME. However I would still prefer Atucha Nuclear Complex to the current situation if we cannot find agreement. --Ita140188 (talk) 09:28, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Given the consensus for a merge (although not necessarily the title), I've completed the merge to the existing disambiguation page, with prejudice as to the final name. I've included Atucha Nuclear Complex in the lede, and perhaps a move could be proposed from there should that be felt necessary. ✅ Klbrain (talk) 07:05, 11 August 2018 (UTC)