Talk:Aubrey Koch/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Thurgate (talk · contribs) 16:26, 10 May 2012 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * prose:  (MoS):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * 2) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:

Comments
1. Of eighteen on board. Suggest - Of the eighteen people on board
 * amended to this, and the following phrase changed for simplicity

2. broke the right leg. Suggest - broke his right leg
 * agreed and done

3. and 13 out of the 31 on board. Suggest - and 13 out of the 31 people on board
 * agreed and done

4. Australian Government determined. Suggest - Australian Government was determined
 * I'd prefer to leave this alone. The meaning is that a determination was made (later reversed by the High Court) rather than simply that the Government had an inclination to do something, see Trans Australia Airlines.

I've put the article on hold for seven days to allow you to address the issues I've brought up. Feel free to contact me on my talk page, or here with any concerns. Thurgate (talk) 16:26, 10 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Passed. Good job. Thurgate (talk) 10:02, 12 May 2012 (UTC)