Talk:Auburn Botanic Gardens

Copyright problem
This article has been reverted to an earlier version as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. Text entered in  and  duplicated at least in part material from [  http://www.auburn.nsw.gov.au/Explore/AuburnBotanicGardens/Pages/AuburnBotanicGardens.aspx the official website], like,  and. It also copied content from this 2008 article (which can be used, if properly attributed - see Plagiarism for how to attribute content used under copyleft). Other content added by this contributor may have been copied from other sources and has been removed in accordance with Copyright violations. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. Content added by other contributors subsequent to the introduction of this material can be restored if it does not merge with this text to create a derivative work. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. Moonriddengirl (talk) 21:50, 29 June 2013 (UTC)


 * (I went ahead and restored the content from the Dictionary of Sydney, with proper attribution. This must not be removed so long as their content remains. See Plagiarism for more information. Thanks. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 22:08, 29 June 2013 (UTC))

Copyright problems on the article
Since 29 June 2013, there are several copyright problem (more than 5) in the article. If the problem persists, please request for page protection. Cheers, NgYShung  huh? 12:16, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Apparently it was copied from the page with CC-BY-SA license, seems like there was a lot of confusion for a lot of copyright patrol users... NgYShung  huh? 12:39, 19 October 2016 (UTC)