Talk:Auchinleck manuscript

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 one external links on Auchinleck manuscript. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111003154343/http://www.nls.uk:8080/StyleServer/calcrgn?cat=Auchinleck&item=107r.sid&style=maps.xsl&wid=500&hei=500&browser=win_ie&plugin=false/ to http://www.nls.uk:8080/StyleServer/calcrgn?cat=Auchinleck&item=107r.sid&style=maps.xsl&wid=500&hei=500&browser=win_ie&plugin=false/
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070705001007/http://www.nls.uk:8080/StyleServer/calcrgn?cat=Auchinleck&item=/205r.sid&style=maps.xsl&wid=500&hei=500&browser=win_ie&plugin=false to http://www.nls.uk:8080/StyleServer/calcrgn?cat=Auchinleck&item=/205r.sid&style=maps.xsl&wid=500&hei=500&browser=win_ie&plugin=false
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111003154422/http://www.nls.uk:8080/StyleServer/calcrgn?cat=Auchinleck&item=/247r.sid&style=maps.xsl&wid=500&hei=500&browser=win_ie&plugin=false/ to http://www.nls.uk:8080/StyleServer/calcrgn?cat=Auchinleck&item=/247r.sid&style=maps.xsl&wid=500&hei=500&browser=win_ie&plugin=false/
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070908224457/http://www.nls.uk:80/auchinleck/editorial/history.html to http://www.nls.uk/auchinleck/editorial/history.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 06:37, 21 October 2016 (UTC)

The argument
I have just tried to clarify some of the expression in the text. As the article refers to the scholarly discussions about the scribes and dialects, (a subject evidently important for this MS) the article could do with setting those debates out a little more clearly, as what is already here is not quite sufficient to present that valuable matter in the round. Also I think the opening statement that this MS represents an attempt by the subjugated English to throw off the Norman yoke and assert their national identity is, shall we say, an idea born of hindsight, rather than a measured statement about the emergence of English vernacular literature? Eebahgum (talk) 09:38, 16 April 2020 (UTC)