Talk:Audio signal processing

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 22 January 2020 and 14 May 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Peer reviewers: Wintersfire.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 14:59, 16 January 2022 (UTC)

'Audio'
Audio signal processing is not quite the same thing as just 'audio' (see for example Vinyl record), but the old page of Audio described it like it was exactly the same thing Audio signal processing. If you have some real content for Audio, please remove the redirect and do a new page :) --Tbackstr


 * Actually, I think 'audio' is an adjective and shouldn't be used without a substantive, like 'audio equipment'. In that case, audio really shouldn't have a separate page. --Tbackstr

x — Preceding unsigned comment added by 182.19.70.83 (talk) 07:10, 5 August 2013 (UTC)

nice one
i'd just like to say, what a great page. s'all. rog

Applications
Under the Applications tab, it is mentioned as "Processing methods and application areas include storage, level compression, data compression, transmission, enhancement (e.g., equalization, filtering, noise cancellation, echo or reverb removal or addition, etc.)" One important field of voice to Text conversions and other such related fields has been missed here. shouldn't we add them ???

Ap aravind (talk) 06:19, 27 July 2009 (UTC)


 * This is, of course, already comprehensively covered in Speech recognition. Since there's no audio signal output, this is more closely related to Audio analysis. I have added a See also link there. ~Kvng (talk) 15:59, 18 August 2021 (UTC)

Extraneous and erroneous material
The entire "History" section is unnecessary and misleading. All it does is explain what an audio signal is, in a simplistic and incorrect way at that, before tagging a random sentence about how the entire concept was important in early radio broadcasting. I propose its deletion; the single relevant sentence can be moved to the introduction paragraph if it is considered useful.

Further, the section on analog signals is mismatched with that for digital signals. An article already exists for both analog signal processing and analog signals themselves: why is this not linked? The syntactical structure of the description is also very confusing and disjointed, e.g. "is usually a continuous, non-discrete, electrical." An electrical what?

I note that in both of these sections an editor has also placed a link to their userpage as some form of signature. This will be removed immediately. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.72.148.123 (talk) 04:11, 20 October 2011 (UTC)


 * This critique is not particularly specific and likely now pertains to content that is no longer in the article. ~Kvng (talk) 16:02, 18 August 2021 (UTC)

India Education Program course assignment
This article was the subject of an educational assignment supported by Wikipedia Ambassadors through the India Education Program.

The above message was substituted from by PrimeBOT (talk) on 19:50, 1 February 2023 (UTC)