Talk:August Palmisano/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Nominator: 04:21, 23 February 2024 (UTC)

Reviewer: Thebiguglyalien (talk · contribs) 06:16, 14 April 2024 (UTC)

Hello! I'll review this within the next few days. The big ugly alien ( talk ) 06:16, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
 * , I've posted a review below. The big ugly alien  ( talk ) 02:38, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Thank you very much for taking on the review. I am happy to make changes to help this become a good article. I had a chance to make edits last night and today, and I also rode out to the cemetery and started a commons category for the person. Lightburst (talk) 20:33, 16 April 2024 (UTC)

, just a few more comments: The big ugly alien ( talk ) 22:45, 16 April 2024 (UTC) ✅ will continue to look for tidbits. 5850 characters now and 4255 before we started the review.
 * Any source describing him as a mobster or being affiliated with the mob should work, but it needs to be stated explicitly and cited somewhere in the body.✅ added a source and stated explicitly.
 * The article still uses original research to go from quoting Balistrieri to interpreting what he might have meant. The article should just summarize the conclusions reached by the sources.✅ removed hinting and left the information stand for readers to interpret
 * Just looking at the Capital Times source, for example, there's more information about his previous legal troubles and about the explosion. I realize it's debatable whether these are true scope issues or just minor details, but I'm inclined to pay more attention to this given the length of the article. I suggest doing a once-over on a few of the major sources to WP:MINE any information that might still be there.


 * , did you want to look any further, or are you satisfied that you've found all of the important details? The big ugly alien  ( talk ) 03:47, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
 * I think that is all. I have included all that I can find. Lightburst (talk) 20:21, 26 April 2024 (UTC)


 * Well-written
 * The lead needs to properly summarize the article. Right now it's just a few short sentences. Also, the first sentence doesn't need to be its own paragraph.✅ expanded slightly, I think it summarizes the major points but if anything is missing please let me know.
 * Palmisano was born – This is the first time he's mentioned in the body, so it should have his full name. ✅ I did a bit of expansion and will do more.
 * Authorities suspected him of being part – I don't know if it's required, but it's good practice to use his surname instead of a pronoun when starting a new paragraph. ✅
 * while others believed him – This is vague. Do we have any information about who? Maybe The source implies that it may be a reason or his death, although it admits this was never proven.
 * A safe in the tavern was "peeled" open – Why is "peeled" in quotes? If it's a technical term, it should stand on its own. If not, it should be replaced with a technical term. ✅ yes the source has it is quotes and then goes on to describe it. So I described the process in a notes section and left the quotation marks.
 * Individual sentences shouldn't have their own sections if it can be avoided. This looks like it would fit nicely at the end of the "Early life" section. ✅ combined into a new personal life section


 * Verifiable with no original research
 * All sources are reliable.

Unsourced:
 * His full name and nickname - ✅ his nickname is cited in citation one "personal life" section. I added it. Will remove middle name for now.
 * His date of birth - ✅ find a grave is not considered reliable. I uploaded his gravestone images to commons. I drove to the cemetery and photographed his grave marker. Sadly it only reads 1928. So I will changed the birthdate to just 1928. The papers all put his age at 49 at the time of death.
 * His description as a "reputed mobster"described as a "substantial figure in organized crime" And many more like that. Not sure how to handle this. ✅ added an explicit mention.

Spot checks:
 * [3] Capital Times – The source says Juneau Garden Village Apartment, not Juneau Village Garden Apartments. And I assume that another citation to this source is supposed to go after The Capital Times newspaper published an article with the headline "Blast Kills Convicted Milwaukee Gambler".? ✅ I had the name of the apartments as what they call them. But I changed it to match the source. Also I moved the citation to support the capital headline.
 * [8] Green Bay Press-Gazette – Good. Note that this is identical to the Capital Times source. ✅
 * [10] Bie – It doesn't look like this source says he "was thought to be behind the bombing". It just quotes him saying something that could be read as him implying he's behind it. ✅ hopefully clearer statement was added.
 * [11] Kenosha News – Not sure if this is relevant. It would be relevant if other sources took note of the headline and wrote about it, but simply citing the article to show that the headline exists doesn't mean much. ✅ I used a part of the article to expand.

The sources I checked have a lot of detail that isn't in the article. While a GA doesn't have to be comprehensive, an article this short isn't justified as a GA if there's still significant room for expansion.
 * Broad in its coverage
 * Expanded slightly. I feel like all of the needed information is in the article. I am willing to add anything which you think I may have missed.

The article uses a neutral tone and no ideas are given undue weight.
 * Neutral

No disputes.
 * Stable

One image with acceptable non-free use rationale, the other two are adequately licensed.
 * Illustrated