Talk:Augustin Lazăr

Keeping the article in accordance with WP:BPL and WP:NOT
Why you deleting this.... As a magistrate, he coordinated complex investigations in the field of organized crime and corruption, as well as the repatriation of stolen historical treasures belonging to the national cultural heritage. In his capacity as Prosecutor General of the Prosecutor's Office attached to the High Court of Cassation and Justice, he promoted the justice reform in the spirit of European values, lead the Romanian Public Ministry in key projects destined to fight corruption, conflict of interests, money laundering offenses, environmental offenses and others; he developed international judicial cooperation, actively participating in the Forum of Prosecutors General of the European Union into the establishment process of the European Prosecutor's Office. As a representative of Romania, he organized and participated at international conferences on combating corruption, business related offenses, crimes against the cultural heritage and so on. During the events organized in Berlin by the Academy for Cultural Diplomacy, between 6 and 10 November 2019, on the occasion of the 30th anniversary of the Fall of the Berlin Wall, the Former Prosecutor General of Romania, Mr. Augustin Lazăr, held the conference with the title "If you Want Peace, prepare Justice - Confidence in the Judiciary, an Essential Value of the Rule of Law”. (https://www.facebook.com/125959932672/posts/10157729711002673 |title=During the events organized in Berlin by the Academy for Cultural Diplomacy, between 6 and 10 November 2019, on the occasion of the 30th anniversary of the Fall of the Berlin Wall, the Former Prosecutor General of Romania, Mr. Augustin Lazăr, held the conference with the title "If you Want Peace, prepare Justice - Confidence in the Judiciary, an Essential Value of the Rule of Law”)
 * , I've moved your question from my talk page to the article's talk page for convenience. The statement about recovering the historical treasures is notable and would have remained in the article if not for the fact that the cited source doesn't mention Augustin Lazăr at all. The statement about promoting the reform lacks notability per WP:BPL and WP:NOT. The statement about attending the conference (with a Facebook post citation) is unencyclopedic per WP:NOTNEWSPAPER. But those aren't the only statements that I am reverting. The article had major violations of WP:BPL and WP:NOT before it was corrected. Then, you reverted all those corrections on October 28 without giving any reason, even though I have asked you about that reversion on your talk page. Enivid (talk) 17:34, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Since you are not responding, I've now reverted your edits again. If you revert them without providing any justification, I will file a dispute resolution request. Thank you! Enivid (talk) 10:30, 29 November 2019 (UTC)