Talk:Augvald

Assessment comment
Substituted at 08:37, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Lead
we are approaching WP:3RR. I agree that etymological history is important, and I do not contest inclusion of it, but editing it where you are doing so results in a broken sentence. It also seems strange that we are introducing a topic by immediately describing another topic. My preference would be that we move this content (which seems arguably covered anyway) down to the 'Name' section, but I would not contest it being covered elsewhere in the lead. Best, Darren-M   talk  13:00, 5 January 2020 (UTC)