Talk:Aungban/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: WPSamson (talk · contribs) 03:07, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

Alright, I had checked on the article that you had nominated for the Good Article. Unfortunately, I had to choose to fail the nomination immediately. The main reason to fail this nomination is that I checked most of the paragraphs has many missing in-line citation and references, and some contents may be potentially original research, which are not allowed on Wikipedia. According to the guideline, this article does not meet one of the basic policies: verifiability. Do you at first read the guideline on how to prepare an article to meet the GA guidelines before nominating it?

I am very recently preparing few articles to be ranked as high-quality article; hence verifiability is one of the most important aspect to become a high-quality article. However, for this article, I can see that this article is still far from being qualify for being a GA status and are quite difficult for me to deal with this issue on this article for now and readers might questioning about the origin of this statements due to missing sources.

Once you fixed the verifiability issues as well as other GA criteria then only you consider renominating for GA status.