Talk:Aus tiefer Not schrei ich zu dir, BWV 38/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Jaguar (talk · contribs) 19:08, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

I'll have this to you soon JAG  UAR   19:08, 13 October 2015 (UTC)


 * Please note that the version when I nominated looked like this. I do not like all changes afterwards but will discuss, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:00, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Should be fine, I always exclude discussions regarding infoboxes from reviews for fair play. JAG  UAR   13:22, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
 * It's not the infobox, lack of which is common to both, and the reason to pick this one for improvements, on top of having strong memories of having written the underlying hymn article when I was in distress. No, what I miss most is the table of recordings. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:35, 15 October 2015 (UTC)

Initial comments

 * "by Johann Sebastian Bach. Bach composed the" - double Bach! Replace "Bach" with he
 * sure --GA


 * "Bach composed the chorale cantata in Leipzig in 1724 in his' second annual cycle" - place a comma between "in" and "his"
 * I moved the cycle thing to the next para (which we didn't have back then, --GA


 * I would merge the two short sentences in the History and text section to one larger paragraph, in order to improve the flow of the prose
 * I seewhat you mean, but it's not connected,--GA


 * "Luther wrote about the psalm that it was coming from a... truly penitent heart that is most deeply moved in its distress" - is this formatted correctly? Luther's statement cuts short here
 * The quote begins with "penitent",comes from a source, and I don't know what came before, --GA


 * "John Eliot Gardiner, who conducted the Bach Cantata Pilgrimage in 2000" - this is already linked
 * don't see it, --GA


 * "cantata Du Friedefürst, Herr Jesu Christ, BWV 116,composed three weeks earlier" - space after comma
 * yes --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:51, 15 October 2015 (UTC)

On hold
This article is overall well-written and comprehensive. I could only find a few minor prose/syntax issues, but other than that it should be good to go. Good work on all the Bach articles so far! JAG UAR   13:37, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks for addressing all of my initial issues. I think that the matters regarding the table can be discussed on the talk page, but regardless, this article now meets the GA criteria! Well done  JAG  UAR   22:04, 15 October 2015 (UTC)