Talk:Austin Bay (Nunavut)

Some existing links are "intended" to refer to the person
At least two of the references that currently link to [point to] the article Austin Bay, namely: List_of_Rice_University_residential_colleges, and plus a talk page: *all* refer to Austin Bay the person, not Austin Bay the body of water. Hence it appears that Austin Bay(person) (or -- should it be Austin Bay(author)?) is already known to be somewhat notable, and that there should be an article about the person (plus -- presumably -- a disambiguation page).
 * the "Notable alumni" paragraph (currently the last paragraph) of
 * the last paragraph (actually, the last 2 words) of John_Quarterman,
 * Talk:The_Path_to_9/11

Could we re-name this (already-existing) article?
Is it too late to re-name the article currently named Austin Bay to something like Austin Bay(body of water)? In order for that "default" article name, Austin Bay, to be available to be used for Austin Bay, the person? (Doing this, would also turn those dead-end links "red" [3 of them are mentioned above], until the article about the person [/slash, author] exists) ...which, IMHO, would be a good thing, because currently someone quite likely might click on one of those links, expecting some info about the person (the author), and will hit this "brick wall" article about some place in Canada, with no disambiguation page features.

The person is (outside Canada, at least!) more notable than the body of water
The evidence from doing a Google search: (i.e. http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=austin+bay&btnG=Search) suggests way more notability for Austin Bay the person, (/the author), than for Austin Bay the place. That is, far more persons (such as, ["non-Canadian"] wikipedia readers) have -- (or, should have) -- heard of Austin Bay the person, (/the author), than Austin Bay the place.

references for "disambiguation page [...] needed":
Some references have been included, to help whomever would like to "start off" the [new] article (the article about the author.) , which expands to say this:


 * so I guess that -- ((the part about "[...] links should not be disambiguated [...]")) -- is the reason why some of the links there, were deliberately left "not" disambiguated. (right?) --Mike Schwartz (talk) 03:05, 18 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Yes that's correct. It appears though that the bot is not running. CambridgeBayWeather Have a gorilla 17:56, 18 January 2009 (UTC)