Talk:Australian contribution to the Allied Intervention in Russia 1918–1919/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

I'll be reviewing this article shortly. Ealdgyth - Talk 00:15, 16 February 2009 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for criteria)

Specific Concerns
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Not enough to hold GA status back, but the first sentence in the lead, is it really necessary to specify Russia in "...assumed power in Russia..."?
 * Third sentence of the lead is awkward, suggest "During the war a number of foreign armies, including the Western allies, also took part. Most of these foreign troops fought against the Red Army, whilst individual foreign volunteers fought on both sides."
 * If you go on to FAC, you'll need a citation for the first paragraph of Context.
 * You need a citation for the last parts of the second paragraph of Context.
 * First sentence of the first paragraph of Australian involvement is awkward, might consider rewording.
 * None of these glitches are enough to keep the article from GA status, and I'll be promoting it after I post this. Ealdgyth - Talk 00:51, 16 February 2009 (UTC)