Talk:Australian contribution to the Battle of Normandy/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Anotherclown (talk · contribs) 09:37, 20 November 2011 (UTC)

Progression

 * Version of the article when originally reviewed:
 * Version of the article when review was closed:

Technical review

 * Citations: The Citation Check tool reveals one error:
 * Herington_131 (Multiple references are using the same name)
 * Fixed
 * Disambiguations: no dab links.
 * Linkrot: External links check out (no action required).
 * Alt text: image lacks alt text so you might consider adding it (suggestion only).
 * Copyright violations: The Earwig Tool is currently not working, however spot checks (on Long 1973) reveal no issues (no action required).

Criteria

 * It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * "...but its crew survived and were evacuated back to the UK", perhaps more simply "but its crew survived and were evacuated to the UK..." (very minor point - suggestion only).
 * Done
 * It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * All major points are refenced to reliable sources.
 * Citations use a consistent style.
 * No issues with OR.


 * It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * All major aspects appear to have been covered.


 * It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * a (fair representation): b (all significant views):
 * Looks fine IMO.


 * It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * No issues here.


 * It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.
 * a (tagged and captioned): b (Is illustrated with appropriate images):  c (non-free images have fair use rationales):  d public domain pictures appropriately demonstrate why they are public domain:
 * No issues. Images are all PD and appropriate for the article.


 * Overall:
 * a Pass/Fail:
 * This is an excellent article IMO. One citation error and a minor prose suggestion; however, nothing to prevent its promotion. Well done. Anotherclown (talk) 10:02, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks a lot for the careful review. Nick-D (talk) 10:10, 21 November 2011 (UTC)