Talk:Authors Film Company

Requested move 13 March 2022

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 

The result of the move request was: Moved: After three relists there is a small consensus to move the article to Authors Film Company. (non-admin closure) Spekkios (talk) 23:07, 11 April 2022 (UTC)

Author's Film Company → Authors' Film Company – File:The Crucible of Life (1918) - 4.jpg on Wikimedia Commons seems to indicate the proper placement of the apostrophe&#32;2603:9001:1501:8C41:C8C4:EF85:8E86:85DC (talk) 02:24, 11 March 2022 (UTC) — Relisting. 🐶 EpicPupper (he/him &#124; talk) 02:56, 18 March 2022 (UTC) — Relisting. 🐶 EpicPupper (he/him &#124; talk) 04:40, 25 March 2022 (UTC)  — Relisting. 🐶 EpicPupper (he/him &#124; talk) 16:48, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
 * This is a contested technical request (permalink). GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 23:48, 13 March 2022 (UTC)


 * That uses s, but and  use s and  and  use no apostrophe at all. Seems greater factual investigation is needed.  --  Tamzin  [ cetacean needed ] (she/they) 22:13, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Oh, Elli, you did this as I was contesting it. --  Tamzin  [ cetacean needed ] (she/they) 22:14, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Moved back with Elli's permission; see their and my edit summaries at Special:Diff/1076964194 and Special:Diff/1076964467. Anyone is free to take this to an RM now, or make the case here with a greater number of sources. --  Tamzin  [ cetacean needed ] (she/they) 22:19, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: WikiProject Articles for creation has been notified of this discussion. 🐶 EpicPupper (he/him &#124; talk) 02:56, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: WikiProject Film has been notified of this discussion. 🐶 EpicPupper (he/him &#124; talk) 02:57, 18 March 2022 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
 * Oppose Author's Film Company → Authors' Film Company due to inconsistency pointed out by Tamzin, but would support Author's Film Company → Authors Film Company [the form that has no apostrophe is currently a redlink] with Author's Film Company as well as Authors' Film Company redirecting to it. —Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 00:29, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Support Authors Film Company. Based on the very limited evidence we have available, that name has the most demonstrated usage in secondary sources. Colin M (talk) 17:17, 10 April 2022 (UTC)