Talk:Autoadmit

1. The portion regarding A.C. cannot be verified and does not meet any of wikipedia's standards regarding content. He may be a pariah or having trouble gaining admission to the New York Bar, but until he is actually denied admission or sanctioned by a Penn student council or newspaper, then you cannot throw that in. 2. No law suit ensued, Leiter only claims to have contacted his lawyer (in good faith will can presume he did, but its irrelevant given the lack of action). 3. Why Brian Leiter hates us is a standard editorial backed by reasonable facts, and as such cannot be deemed defamation (most likely why he did not go to court over the issue).

This is certainly a contentious topic, but let us aim to keep the page neutral.

I'll be working throughout the next few days to clean this article up.--T14LawStudent 17:11, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

This is unsourced:

The Leiter controversy has led to numerous wars in Wikipedia over terms popular on the AutoAdmit site. Some argue that Leiter is behind these attacks. Others argue that this is just paranoia and that he has nothing to do with them.

Even if true, is it relevant enough to keep? RJFJR 16:58, 20 June 2006 (UTC)

The entry should be deleted, like its precedessor. But if it is to exist, it shouldn't be an advertisement for the site, but an accurate report of what it is and how it is regarded by professionals.

Redirect from "XOXOHTH"
xoxohth should redirect to this page, but I don't know how =(