Talk:Autodesk Revit

Move from Revit Architecture to Revit
I think it's just plain wrong to call this page Revit Architecture. Revit Architecture is one of three programs in the Revit family. I accept that RAC is better known than Structure or MEP, but that doesn't change the facts. I suggest a move back to Revit and a reorganisation of the article so the three platforms are explained separately. I see that Requested_moves has a big backlog so I won't bother them. If I don't hear cries of protest I'll move this sometime in the future --duncan.lithgow (talk) 00:32, 16 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Wait a second. 1. What's the difference between Revit Building and Revit Architecture? If there are two softwares named Revit there should be such a move. 2. You really should tag a Revit in this page.

Invalid Link
I don't have time right now to fix it, but the link under Products to "Building Design Suites" is invalid. Psubrian (talk) 19:42, 10 July 2014 (UTC)

Requested move

 * The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: the page has been moved to Autodesk Revit as agreed below. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 13:38, 22 September 2012 (UTC)

Autodesk Revit Architecture → Revit – for duncan.lithgow - 110.232.42.149 (talk) 14:35, 25 August 2012 (UTC)

Do you still consider this as a controversial or potentially controversial move? --duncan.lithgow (talk) 21:28, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
 * There is no such thing as Revit Building, what are you refering to? There is Revit software platform which is available in three 'flavours': Revit Architecture, Revit Structure and Revit MEP. These products have been / are (I'm not quite sure at the moment) available separately. Now in 2013 you can also buy Revit All-in-one / One Box which includes the functionality of all platforms in one application. That's a good example of how the difference between these platforms are not extensive. I'm sorry if I'm ignorant of the procedures for moving a page, what are you referring to with Revit ? Did I use the wrong tag (did I even use a tag?) Is there something wrong with the way I'm proposing this change? Thanks for adding the tag to this conversation, are there more formalities we should observe? --duncan.lithgow (talk) 15:13, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Revit Building 9 --110.232.42.149 (talk) 16:44, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks for that link, but if you look at the build numbers and PDFs you'll see that you're looking at a product from 2006. Why Autodesk is so lazy with cleaning up their website is a mystery, I've often had similar problems trying to find out what the current version of something is... Here are two links to the history of Revit http://bimboom.blogspot.dk/2007/02/revit-history_11.html http://forums.augi.com/showthread.php?20803-Revit-Timeline-%28W-I-P-%29 You can see how the products fit together in 2012/2013 here: http://usa.autodesk.com/revit/how-to-buy/ --duncan.lithgow (talk) 21:28, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Do you mean Revit Building is a former name of Revit Architecture? Or it's a tool in Revit Architecture? Then it should be mentioned in the article. --222.35.187.25 (talk) 13:32, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
 * it was renamed. I've added that info to the history section (which needs a cleanup) --duncan.lithgow (talk) 09:47, 2 September 2012 (UTC)
 * I wonder whether we should have 3 different article, one of whom named Autodesk Revit Architecture, or we should place all content in one article named Revit Series. --222.35.187.25 (talk) 13:32, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
 * As Ive said before the differences between RAC,RST and RMEP are so few compared to what they have in common that I think they should remain in one article unless some people knowledgable of the difference and willing to write them up begins to contribute. I hope to add something about the differences in the future but I've found it tricky because the function are always changing. So I say one article called simply Autodesk Revit, with some clarification of differences. --duncan.lithgow (talk) 09:47, 2 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Thank you! I agree with the move. --110.232.42.149 (talk) 03:36, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Great. I won't make this move until I have time to adjust the text appropriately and add section for the three flavours. --duncan.lithgow (talk) 05:45, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Web site

 * http://www.revit-basics.com/revithistory.html is suspended --Palapa (talk) 10:29, 28 January 2013 (UTC)

The URL is long gone. Internet Archive has a couple backups and none of them appear to be perfect: https://web.archive.org/web/20120701000000*/http://www.revit-basics.com/revithistory.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by MEP1697 (talk • contribs) 17:15, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 one external links on Autodesk Revit. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140302064642/http://www.styleofdesign.com/architecture/a-brief-history-of-bim-michael-s-bergin/ to http://www.styleofdesign.com/architecture/a-brief-history-of-bim-michael-s-bergin/
 * Added tag to http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect2=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&u=/netahtml/PTO/search-bool.html&r=1&f=G&l=50&d=PALL&RefSrch=yes&Query=PN/8040358
 * Added tag to http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect2=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&u=/netahtml/PTO/search-bool.html&r=1&f=G&l=50&d=PALL&RefSrch=yes&Query=PN/7278164
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121010062118/http://news.autodesk.com:80/news/autodesk/20120905005613/en/Autodesk-Announces-Autodesk-Revit-LT to http://news.autodesk.com/news/autodesk/20120905005613/en/Autodesk-Announces-Autodesk-Revit-LT
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120927045135/http://usa.autodesk.com:80/adsk/servlet/pc/compare/index?siteID=123112&id=20336963 to http://usa.autodesk.com/adsk/servlet/pc/compare/index?siteID=123112&id=20336963
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121115121408/http://www.pikeresearch.com:80/newsroom/building-information-modeling-market-to-reach-6-5-billion-worldwide-by-2020 to http://www.pikeresearch.com/newsroom/building-information-modeling-market-to-reach-6-5-billion-worldwide-by-2020

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 05:33, 22 October 2016 (UTC)