Talk:Automatic repeat request

Requested move

 * The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was moved. -- Aervanath (talk) 07:23, 3 April 2009 (UTC)

Automatic repeat-request → Automatic repeat request — To remove the random extra hyphen. — Dicklyon (talk) 04:10, 28 March 2009 (UTC)

Survey

 * Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with  or  , then sign your comment with  . Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.


 * Support – as nom. It is standard to name articles after the noun form, not the hyphenated adjective form of compounds (as in automatic repeat-request protocol). Dicklyon (talk) 04:12, 28 March 2009 (UTC)

Discussion

 * Any additional comments:
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Positive Acknowledgment with Retransmission
Should these pages be merged with each other? Ngriffeth (talk) 22:01, 10 May 2009 (UTC)

Request for move (capitalization)
According to, the correct capitalization is Automatic Repeat reQuest. Ideally the content located at this article should be moved to Automatic Repeat reQuest.

Gmazeroff (talk) 14:54, 20 January 2010 (UTC)


 * On the other hand, WP:MOS explicitly states the capitalization for highlighting the source of acronyms should not be done. (Personally, I don't care.) And since neither of the words in automatic repeat request are proper nouns, following wikipedia policy everything should be lower-case. Nageh (talk) 15:58, 20 January 2010 (UTC)