Talk:Automatic switched-transport network

Well I think it may be interesting to distinguish between ASTN and GMPLS because ASTN is an architecture and GMPLS a set of protocol, moreover they depend on different standard bodies...

Definitely agree. GMPLS isn't necessarily optical, or at least is agnostic to it if it is passing either time slot information or cross-connect port information. Howard C. Berkowitz 13:58, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

BTW: There's a link to GMPLS on the page, which points back to this page. Is it planned to eventually have a GMPLS article? --80.136.109.4 (talk) 20:28, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

I second the proposal. There should be separate pages for ASTN and GMPLS, as the article is saying that they are not identical.

The division between the two pages would be at the second paragraph: GMPLS consists of several protocols... --Cgbraschi (talk) 14:23, 31 January 2011 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on Automatic switched-transport network. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110721080440/http://www.itea2.org/public/documents/TBONES_demonstration.pdf to http://www.itea2.org/public/documents/TBONES_demonstration.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 06:30, 22 October 2016 (UTC)