Talk:Avadhanum Paupiah

untitled
"The Holland brothers" don't appear as Governors of Madras.--Wetman (talk) 19:01, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Of course, there is John Holland and Edward J. Holland who succeeded him.- The Enforcer Office of the secret service 05:16, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

??
"Paupiah forged evidence against Haliburton[2] and soon landed him in deep trouble bringing an end to his period of service in India.[1][3]"

What do you mean by "deep trouble"? Please be more specific. r ʨ anaɢ talk/contribs 13:09, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Also, what did he forge evidence of? r ʨ anaɢ talk/contribs 13:16, 23 February 2009 (UTC)


 * The source that I've used only mentions that Paupiah "helped in creating false evidence against Haliburton". It doesn't mention anything about what the "false evidence" was, nor have I been able to find anything on the web which seem to suggest what it might have been. As for the usage of the phrase "deep trouble", I've replaced it with an appropriate alternative.- The Enforcer Office of the secret service 05:28, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
 * The new wording is now unclear about whether Paupiah brought an end to Haliburton's service, or to his own (which I assume is the correct interpretation). r ʨ anaɢ talk/contribs 13:09, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Haliburton is the subject in the line and the new wording is perfectly clear about who brought an end to whose career. I also request you to examine the other book and the column in The Hindu which have also been used as source for the article. By the way, is this even remotely connected to the DYK hook that I've nominated. The hook only deals with Paupiah's conviction and the reason for his conviction. It doesn't deal with who caused whose end.- The Enforcer Office of the secret service  13:32, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
 * It's relevant for DYK because we need to be able to write a clear and concise hook, using clear and concise facts. The reason I asked for more details is because I didn't want to write a vague hook about forging evidence without being able to say what kind of evidence it was.  I will keep trying to look for something to write a decent hook about. r ʨ anaɢ talk/contribs 13:57, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Ok- The Enforcer Office of the secret service 14:04, 24 February 2009 (UTC)