Talk:Avatars (Charmed)

Untitled
This article is badly in need of rewriting. Instances of poor grammer, and in some cases uninterpretable sentences, abound throughout. If anyone has the time to work on this situation, it would be appreciated as I'm stretched for time, however, I'll work on it at some point if no action is taken, I just don't know when. — Huntster «Talk • Contribs • Email» 22:09, 20 June 2006 (UTC)

I clicked on the talk page to say exactly the same thing. I'm going on a trip, so I don't know when I'll be able to work on it, but I will as soon as I can. Noneofyourbusiness 17:28, 26 June 2006 (UTC)

Deceased Avatar
Shouldn't Cole be listed as a deceased Avatar since he's now dead? --Malevious Userpage •Talk Page• Contributions 23:35, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Nope, when Cole was vanquished he was only Belthazor, due to the spell he cast which altered reality.--NeilEvans 23:49, 28 December 2006 (UTC)

Cole Turner would be considered a deceased Avatar even though he was Belthazor in the Alternate Reality. It is quite apparent that if he could become an Avatar as a Demon who cannot die, then he most certainly could become an Avatar as Belthazor; a powerful Demon who could die, which is what he was. Think about it, why would the Avatars still deal with Cole in the Alternate Reality? He still had Avataric Abilities.

Inaccuracies
The text appears to insinuate that the Avatars do not kill those they remove from their Utopia, but it is made clear in the series that this is exactly what they do (ref. killing Leo, etc). Also this text doesn't mention the central point of this plot, that the good/evil duality is a contrast that is required to perceive either, and that the existence of a choice is intrinsic to free will. Zuiram 19:45, 31 March 2007 (UTC)