Talk:Avenged Sevenfold/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * B. MoS compliance:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources:
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Pass or Fail:

Yes, There are a lot of question marks there. You could have checked for a lot of these things and it looks like you didn't. KezianAvenger (talk) 12:30, 10 August 2009 (UTC)

Allow me to explain this better for anyone who doesn't quite understand it all. 1. It's confusing in places. 2. Lack of sources, We can easily fix this. 3. Unsure of how broadly it covers the topic. 4. It is Neutral. 5. Unsure of stability. (It is stable though) 6. Images are legal but could use captions and one or two more. 7. Quick-Failed due to being confusing and short for such a mainstream band. KezianAvenger (talk) 12:37, 10 August 2009 (UTC)