Talk:Average memory access time

Proposed merge with Concurrent average memory access time
C-AMAT has been very recently proposed and seems not to have gained much traction yet; the sources for this article have attracted less than a handful of citations each. I suggest we relegate C-AMAT to a section of the article on AMAT. Q VVERTYVS (hm?) 08:41, 29 July 2015 (UTC)

Hi Qwertyus, we believe C-AMAT has received significant attention as a memory metric and thus deserves its own wiki page. In fact, here are a few a links to its appearance on the news: hpctoday and ccf. Although recent, the C-AMAT wiki page has also been viewed over 700 times. However, the current statistics shown for the C-AMAT wiki are not correct. We believe this may have been caused by redirecting C-AMAT to this wiki page. Please let us know if you want any further information or any other questions. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ahaider3 (talk • contribs) 01:01, 2 August 2015 (UTC)


 * I can't read the CCF page, but the HPC Today article was written by the same author as the references in the article. I wonder where the 700 figure comes from; I see 23 views in July and 2 in August. Q VVERTYVS (hm?) 08:52, 2 August 2015 (UTC)


 * I just checked the citing references and I changed my mind regarding the merge. I'm going to put the page up for deletion instead. Q VVERTYVS (hm?) 08:58, 2 August 2015 (UTC)