Talk:Aviation biofuel

NPOV concern
I see the phrasing "X is not adversely affected by Y".

In a topic which is about basing a resource on plants, this is disingenuous phrasing when used to support replacing a different plant-based resource (rubber trees are plants, or at least Rubber was originally from such a source) with a synthetic which is not cross linked and may be a trademarked/patented product.

The expectation that the fuel will force a part to expand during use should include that the expectation is based on wide-spread industry usage, and could cross reference the history section of a petroleum article, or reference the company growth of aviation. We can't assume any given reader knows how wide-spread a given rubber is within the parts for an aviation fuel-system, nor how crucial, fragile, or easily repaired currently.

Does it make things not work, or does it make them fail sooner, or does it make them better but under less circumstances? If it's not been studied formally, can we say it on wikipedia at all, maybe it's just opinion?

However conflating "parts dependency" with "source of part" is against NPOV in my opinion. The fuels are being made, and how the industry accepts them is its business. Current phrasing implies that X will replace because it solves a concern; even though it does not use the word "replace" I think it's a predictive attempt, and not Neutral.

Separating them and still mentioning it may be valid.

I would support rephrasing into "concerns raised by whom" and some subsections, as I don't think commercial aviation is the only involved party. We might do well to separate financial concern from commercial entities, from technical aspects, and from legal or social ones. I'd also expect requirements to be separated clearly from loud desires, and links referenced.

From an encyclopedia, I'd expect to see how much effort airlines go to when they retool their engine lines, if there are references to past events where the industry at large was forced or accepted a major initiative to do so. If there are no such references, please cleanup phrases implying or claiming difficulty.

Support for my concern (plant): wikipedia's words related to rubber redirect their links to the plant based rubber primary page, and from there, additional links to synthetics exist.

Support for my concern (predictive): mentioning specific replacement products might count as original research. We discuss a topic of current change, discoveries are still being made and tests designed for a different fuel are being applied to this variety of them. More than the fuel itself may change; this article is only about the fuel. -- Starshine (yes I know I'm not logged in right now) 99.51.74.201 (talk) 15:52, 16 June 2013 (UTC)

Merge proposal

 * Support merging Algae jet fuel to create more comprehensive article. Alternatively, merge Algae jet fuel into Algae fuel. Beagel (talk) 07:17, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Merge, given the clear relation and that Algae jet fuel is a short stub.--E8 (talk) 14:42, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

COI Edit Requests
I have a financial COI with Honeywell in that they’ve recruited me to help them navigate through Wikipedia and COI Best Practices. I have the following content suggestions for consideration. Corporate 16:25, 13 August 2012 (UTC)

Concerns and Challenges
I would like to correct the Concerns and Challenges section. The problem it discusses is actually the opposite (low temperatures, not high). The proposed revised is as follows:
 * Biodiesel that is stored for long periods of time is more likely to oxidize, especially at low temperatures, causing it to gel. Some additives improve the cold weather tolerance of biodiesel, but only by a few degrees. Nitrile-based rubber materials expand in the presence of of aromatic compounds found in conventional petroleum fuel. Pure biofuels that aren't mixed with petrolum and don't contain paraffin-based additives may cause rubber seals and hoses to shrink. Manufacturers are starting to use a synthetic rubber substitute called Viton for seals and hoses. Viton isn't adversely affected by biofuels.

Feedback from other editors
Thanks, Corporate, the text is independently referenced and appears balanced. Unfortunately the link in the 2nd ref is dead. If you could provide a copy of the source or an alternate reference, I am happy to approve the edit. 1292simon (talk) 10:55, 23 August 2012 (UTC)


 * I improved the sourcing, as well as the content itself based on some additional research. Corporate 15:27, 23 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Corporate, thanks for your contribution. It is well referenced and seems unbiased, therefore I approve you to make the edit:

1292simon (talk) 08:19, 24 August 2012 (UTC)

Demonstration Flights
I would like to submit for consideration adding to the list of demonstration flights. Corporate 19:15, 31 August 2012 (UTC)

References

Discussion
I think these are OK except the Alaska airlines source is a press release, so I think the text needs to say: "according to Alaska Airlines". -- — Keithbob • Talk  • 17:46, 6 October 2012 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 8 one external links on Aviation biofuel. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120425051329/http://www.safug.org/information/pledge/ to http://www.safug.org/information/pledge/
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091225003204/http://www.biofuelsdigest.com:80/blog2/2009/01/08/continental-airlines-tests-aviation-biofuel-first-use-of-algae-first-us-biofuel-test-flight-first-two-engine-flight to http://www.biofuelsdigest.com/blog2/2009/01/08/continental-airlines-tests-aviation-biofuel-first-use-of-algae-first-us-biofuel-test-flight-first-two-engine-flight/
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100409084432/http://www.af.mil/news/story.asp?id=123197415 to http://www.af.mil/news/story.asp?id=123197415
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120403025638/http://www.navair.navy.mil/index.cfm?fuseaction=home.NAVAIRNewsStory&id=4766 to http://www.navair.navy.mil/index.cfm?fuseaction=home.NAVAIRNewsStory&id=4766
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111014222123/http://www.klm.com:80/corporate/en/newsroom/press-releases/archive-2011/KLM_launches_commercial_flights_Amsterdam.html to http://www.klm.com/corporate/en/newsroom/press-releases/archive-2011/KLM_launches_commercial_flights_Amsterdam.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150926010629/http://www.jetstar.com/mediacentre/latest-announcements/detail?id=AE346285-0C42-46E6-AE17-23F3DF2666A3 to http://www.jetstar.com/mediacentre/latest-announcements/detail?id=AE346285-0C42-46E6-AE17-23F3DF2666A3
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111025155648/http://www.csiro.au/files/files/p10rv.pdf to http://www.csiro.au/files/files/p10rv.pdf
 * Added tag to http://www.sustainableablesky.com
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110928031547/http://www.aef.org.uk/?category_name=biofuel to http://www.aef.org.uk/?category_name=biofuel

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 13:40, 22 October 2016 (UTC)

Requested move 28 March 2021

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 

The result of the move request was: Closed no consensus. (non-admin closure) Chidgk1 (talk) 11:20, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

Aviation biofuel → Sustainable aviation fuel – It is not just biofuel but also electrofuel.

– Chidgk1 (talk) 15:39, 28 March 2021 (UTC)


 * Sustainable aviation fuel currently redirects here, to the Aviation biofuel section. You are putting the cart before the horses: first there should be a presentation of electrofuel/synthetic fuels (why two articles on the same subject?!) before even thinking about changing the name, and even then, WP:commonname should incite to keep the more widespread, and more understandable biofuel above the sustainable fuel techno-jargon, unless the biofuel and synthetic fuel parts are similar in size. --Marc Lacoste (talk) 06:24, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I am not sure if I am convinced by the evidence there per Marc Lacoste -- I am wondering what those other kinds of fuels should exist. But describing just the biofuel content as sustainable -- is kindof greenwashing on first impression, Sadads (talk) 16:14, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

Although the electrofuel article is small it is a particular kind of synthetic fuel, and I don't think it should be merged into the parent article, because it has potential to grow. If I had known about electrofuel at the time SAF was merged in here by I might have suggested merging the other way around. On the other hand I take 's point that if the word sustainable is in the title it excludes any aviation biofuel which is judged unsustainable. So given that both aviation biofuel and aviation electrofuel are claimed to be sustainable do you think SAF should become a disambiguation? Chidgk1 (talk) 12:21, 30 March 2021 (UTC)


 * Go ahead, create a #synthetic fuel section in this article, if it grows enough, renaming the article Sustainable aviation fuel would be much more straightforward. Unsustainable biofuel could be noted as such if necessary.--Marc Lacoste (talk) 17:41, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

This is getting confusing. I don't know the subject well enough and don't want to spend too much time on it. So I think I will leave these articles for other people. Closing this request. Chidgk1 (talk) 11:17, 31 March 2021 (UTC)


 * I agree with Chidgk1. Sustainable aviation fuel should not redirect to Aviation biofuel#Sustainable fuels section. Reasoning - aviation biofuel or bio-jet fuel or bio-aviation fuel (BAF) is a subset of Sustainable Aviation Fuel (SAF) not SAF in it's entirety. A potential solution could be - link from Sustainable Aviation Fuels to Aviation biofuel, also electrofuel/synthetic fuels, and other emerging technologies. Shell.Clarke (talk) 15:06, 20 December 2022 (UTC)

Saffire
See

https://energypost.eu/saffire-cheap-sustainable-aviation-fuel-from-agricultural-waste/

Now one source (and possibly primary at that) doesn't make an article, but it's one to watch.

Also raised at Talk:Saffire. Andrewa (talk) 13:37, 8 July 2022 (UTC)

Hunger versus biofuels
The article reads like one-sided promotion of biofuels, pushed by the world’s rich flying class at the expense of the majority of the world’s population who don’t have a voice. If a billion people don’t have enough to eat, the best way to reduce emissions from flying is to tax flying so people fly less. While research snd development in SAFs is welcome, the solution is not to set up a competition between food supplies and biofuels without at the same time reducing flying. If these issues are not carefully addressed the article approaches greenwashing. We need to realize from the outset that aviation is producing 2.5% of the world’s CO2 and 5% of the warming due to other greenhouse gases and that these proportions are currently expected to grow even if at the same time the use of biofuels increases. Clearly, biofuels are not the solution, although they can be part of a larger solution. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1364032117305786 194.118.241.218 (talk) 04:06, 16 August 2022 (UTC)


 * feel free to edit the article although you might like to find a more recent source Chidgk1 (talk) 14:59, 25 February 2023 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion: Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 21:07, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
 * SENASA SAF.jpg