Talk:Avigdor Stematsky

Copyright problems
In addition to the copy from, for which it seems likely permission might be obtained, this article includes copying and very close paraphrasing from other sources.

For instance:

Precisely duplicated content is bolded; some of the content which is not bolded follows closely.

Such close paraphrasing can be a problem under both our copyright policies and our guideline on plagiarism. While facts are not copyrightable, creative elements of presentation – including both structure and language – are.

As a website that is widely read and reused, Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously to protect the interests of the holders of copyright as well as those of the Wikimedia Foundation and our reusers. Wikipedia's copyright policies require that the content we take from non-free sources, aside from brief and clearly marked quotations, be rewritten from scratch. The essay Close paraphrasing contains some suggestions for rewriting that may help avoid these issues. The article Wikipedia Signpost/2009-04-13/Dispatches also contains some suggestions for reusing material from sources that may be helpful, beginning under "Avoiding plagiarism". --Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:26, 22 April 2012 (UTC)
 * It seems the original source for this material was Oxford Grove Art, which is fully reserved. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 11:01, 18 May 2012 (UTC)