Talk:Avro Canada Chinook

--- Claimed differences from the Jumo 004

This wiki article claims "The primary difference in design was the use of six separate flame cans instead of the singular annular combustor of the Jumo." Yet the Jumo quite clearly uses 6 flame cans (the BMW 003 used an annular design, but there's no mention of that being used or studied by Avro engineers).

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Junkers_Jumo_004_(1941)_used_in_Messerschmitt_Me262_and_Arado_Ar234_at_Flugausstellung_Hermeskeil,_pic2.JPG

https://c1.staticflickr.com/5/4683/39349648272_0c4943e8c1_b.jpg — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.192.103.59 (talk) 07:02, 2 January 2019 (UTC)

No it doesn't
"This source from Trent University claims that the TR.3 was also an axial-flow design, and Boyd decided to spin off the TR.4 as a smaller version of it."

It doesn't say anything of the sort. It says they were working on the TR3 and then decided to make a smaller design, the TR4. It does not imply or even slightly suggest the TR4 is a smaller TR3, it simply says that it's smaller than the TR3. Maury Markowitz (talk) 19:52, 17 July 2021 (UTC)