Talk:Avy Jetter

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 22 August 2018 and 6 December 2018. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Hc-ratljost. Peer reviewers: OpticalWriter, Fisher2019.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 17:44, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Hc-ratljost Peer Review
Hi Hc-ratljost,

The page seems to be off to a really awesome start, especially given the fact that you are building this from the ground up (which isn't easy)! I think the way you have chosen to divide the information is effective so far, as it is organized, relevant, and easy to follow. The only suggestions I have are things you are likely planning on incorporating as you build up your page more, such as adding in additional biographical information, producing a solid lead paragraph, and creating spaces for an Infobox and references. Overall, however, the initial stages look great - keep up the good work!

- OpticalWriter (talk) 21:11, 13 November 2018 (UTC)

Hc-ratljost Peer Review Response
Hi OpticalWriter,

Thank you so much for your suggestions! I have definitely looked into expanding the sections you mentioned becuase I think they are fundamental to the page. I'm having trouble creating an Infobox, but I'm working with the WikiEdu chat to see what I can do. Check back in to see the final result! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hc-ratljost (talk • contribs) 02:45, 3 December 2018 (UTC)

Hc-ratljost's Peer Review
Since you're starting a whole new page, the layout is important and so far I like the headings you're working with. I do suggest that you start thinking about what you want to include in the paragraph that goes right below Avy Jetter's name. I think that introduction to your artist is very important, as it should provide a brief but thorough background and is the first thing that visitors see. Though you could work on that when your page is done so you have all of your information. I think the info you have included briefly under your headings is a good start, I would just suggest that you cite while you write. I look forward to reading the live site!

-(Fisher2019 (talk) 00:41, 20 November 2018 (UTC))

Hc-ratljost's Peer Review Response
Hi Fisher2019,

Thank you for the kind words of encouragement! It was daunting to create a whole new page, but I really like getting to have complete control over the design and flow. I have updated the introduction section of the page, and I would love your feedback. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hc-ratljost (talk • contribs) 02:47, 3 December 2018 (UTC)

Avery's Peer Review
Wow, your sandbox is very neatly laid out. It gives me inspiration on how I should plan my page before writing it. First of all, it's obvious that you spent a lot of time researching and I am impressed that you were able to find so much information that was missing from Jetter's Wikipedia page. Likewise, your formatting is precise and easy for me as a reader to follow. I would maybe provide a link (if there's one available) for the Innocence project because I bet a lot of people would be interested in that after learning about her involvement with it. I am also curious to know how' she supports the black and LGBTQ+ communities if there is any research available on that. Also, it might be cool if you emphasized which of her works are the most popular/ how they are generally received--but that is just a thought. You seem like you are really onto something and this artist is very fortunate to have a conscientious editor like you writing for her. I look forward to seeing your page develop.'' Averyyclements (talk) 03:44, 20 November 2018 (UTC)Averyyclements

Avery's Peer Review Response
Hi Averyyclements, Thank you for your support. I'm glad I could help inspire your page; I'm eager to see how yours turns out. I went ahead and took your advice on the Innocence Project. I've now hyperlinked it to the correct Wikipedia page. Thanks for the suggestion! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hc-ratljost (talk • contribs) 02:49, 3 December 2018 (UTC)