Talk:Awe/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Zanimum (talk · contribs) 01:27, 20 November 2013 (UTC)

Awesome that there's an article on awe. When I first saw it, I was in denial that it would be about awe the emotion, I though it would be something else with the same name.

That said, I'm going to quick fail this.


 * everything in the lead should be in the article, and thus, if it's in the article too, there shouldn't be references in the lead
 * you haven't taken care of easy things like "disambiguation needed" tags
 * some of the references aren't properly formatted, they're just plain jane links
 * Dictonary.com isn't just "Dictionary". It's either dictionary.com, or whatever source they cited for the actual info. I see Random House, Collins, and Online Etymology Dictionary cited.
 * I'm wondering about whether some of the sites cited qualify as reliable sources, just looking the URLs, as opposed to the content. You'd know better, but just a heads up.

I've not read any of the article, but it looks like it has good bones. It just needs more citations, and better quality citations here and there. -- Zanimum (talk) 01:27, 20 November 2013 (UTC)