Talk:Axon Enterprise

non-lethal vs. less-lethal
The article says, "less-lethal", but the reference it points you to (the corporate profile) says "non-lethal".

This could be due to a dispute over the truth of the "non-lethal" claim. If so, that should be made clear. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.146.59.230 (talk) 04:35, 12 June 2006 (UTC)


 * I changed it back to "less-lethal" and linked to an Amnesty International article that claims more than 150 TASER-related deaths. --SURIV 21:02, 7 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Amnesty International don't strike me as experts in tasers. It seems that every time there is death of someone recently hit by a taser no investigation can prove a link between the taser and their death. Unbiased research and experiments seem to show that tasers are far  less lethal then other devices. See  taser-is-easy-on-the-heart at physicsworld.com in November 2007. Would it be better/safer to shoot people? Seems unlikely! 220  of  Borg 08:42, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

TASER acronym
I remember that TASER is an acronym-however, not the one given. Looking for confirmation here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.145.169.229 (talk) 03:24, 25 June 2006 (UTC)

TASER is an acronym for "Tom Swift's Electric Rifle". —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.32.212.8 (talk) 19:16, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

Duplicate page
Why do we have this page and also the one about Taser_International??? I think this page is a repeat. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Herbys (talk • contribs) 03:44, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

HELLO: Is anybody paying attention?
As the above editor noted, there are TWO entirely separate articles about this company -- and that's been the case for the last year-and-a-half. Somebody really needs to deal with this. Cgingold 10:19, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

TASER versus Taser
According to Naming conventions, this article should be titled Taser International. See also Talk:Taser. I don't have a strong opinion, but uniformity would be nice. Flatscan (talk) 00:54, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
 * TASER International is now at Taser International, per your comment and per the Manual of Style. --Ckatz chat spy  05:11, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
 * On second thought, in the context of TASER the brand vs. taser the product, TASER is actually an acronym, originating from Tom Swift and his Electric Rifle. ViperSnake151   Talk  23:44, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

Copyright problem
This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 00:53, 7 February 2010 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Axon (company). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080910070837/http://www.cpsc.gov/LIBRARY/FOIA/advisory/236.pdf to http://www.cpsc.gov/LIBRARY/FOIA/advisory/236.pdf
 * Added tag to http://investor.taser.com/phoenix.zhtml?c=129937&p=irol-newsArticle&ID=1566093&highlight=
 * Added tag to http://investor.taser.com/phoenix.zhtml?c=129937&p=irol-newsArticle&ID=1677761&highlight=

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 18:06, 12 July 2017 (UTC)

Improving the page
This page has a lot of false information, unfinished parts, and overall the structure seems pretty scrappy. While I'm not exactly an adept editor (I barely know what I'm doing), I'm trying to spend a lot of time improving it, fixing mistakes, and adding content.

Hopefully other people join me with this? Especially more experienced editors who can help or point me in the right direction Personhumanperson (talk) 18:12, 7 November 2023 (UTC)