Talk:Axwell & Ingrosso

Can't Hold Us Down
I'm no expert on what constitutes a single these days when you can buy individual tracks but doesn't this say there was both an original single and a remix? --Cavrdg (talk) 13:26, 10 March 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on Axwell and Ingrosso. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151226154145/http://www.sverigetopplistan.se/ to http://www.sverigetopplistan.se/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 19:51, 22 October 2016 (UTC)

Clean up

 *  Comment -, , , , , and , due to the complexity of the error in which the track listing for the Extended Plays was very far to the right of the left margin, I did a wholesale revert to the article, reverted to Revision as of 22:23, 28 December 2017. --Jax 0677 (talk) 17:53, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
 * I don't see anything different in your revert to that particular section, and this doesn't excuse reverting all the improvements made to the article in the interim time. You can fix the way the extended plays track listing displays yourself without undoing all the other improvements made to the article, particularly by ANode. Undoing; don't revert again per WP:BRD because you've already made enough to the article for today. Wanting to fix one section does not excuse all the other reverts made to the rest of the article. Your edit doesn't even touch the track listing of the EPs at all so how you think this improves the way it displays is beyond me.  Ss  112   18:36, 12 February 2018 (UTC)

BLP Template Removal
Hey guys! Recently, I've seen that the History section is pretty well referenced, and that every claim has a citation attached to it. Would this be the right time to take down the BLP template? aNode  (discuss)  10:28, 8 March 2018 (UTC)