Talk:Ayla (Chrono Trigger)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Blue Pumpkin Pie (talk · contribs) 14:54, 29 October 2019 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

I'll be reviewing this article. This one shouldn't take long.Blue Pumpkin Pie (talk) 14:54, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):  d (copyvio and plagiarism):
 * Who is Michael P Williams. I see he wrote books in the past but I don't know if he's credibly or note-worthy. He's the only source I'm not sure about.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Pass/Fail:

The source is more uplifted through the publisher, Boss Fight Books, rather than Williams himself. Basically as though he wrote for IGN or Polygon. - Bryn (talk) (contributions) 09:02, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Here is some clarifying information about BFB: - Bryn (talk)  (contributions) 09:17, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Ok. in that case, it does seem like a note-worthy mention. I'll give it a pass now.Blue Pumpkin Pie (talk) 20:15, 2 November 2019 (UTC)