Talk:Ayodhyapuri

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on Ayodhyapuri. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081012163506/http://www.digitalhimalaya.com/collections/nepalcensus/form.php?selection=1 to http://www.digitalhimalaya.com/collections/nepalcensus/form.php?selection=1

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 22:33, 22 October 2016 (UTC)

Palace of Ayodhya
If it is true, then where is location of Lord Rama's palace in Nepal ? AbhayMahadik (talk) 05:15, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
 * May be under construction. :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by AbhayMahadik (talk • contribs) 05:15, 14 July 2020 (UTC)

Aayodhya
Birthplace of God Ram. Nsapkota (talk) 19:40, 20 July 2020 (UTC)

Birthplace of God Ram, Aayodhyapuri, Chitawan Nepal. Nsapkota (talk) 19:43, 20 July 2020 (UTC)


 * Sources please! --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 19:52, 20 July 2020 (UTC)

Archeological Study
Department of Archeology has started study regarding the birthplace of lord Ram. Bhattarai1237 (talk) 18:14, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Let us know the outcome. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 19:49, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
 * A couple of points. Since there is clearly more than one place that is claimed to be the birthplace of Rama, you cannot say "known to be". Ayodhyapuri is one candidate amongst at least two possible places. Secondly, your formulation makes little sense. What do you mean by "trace out evidences"? Evidence is used both for the plural as well as the singular. And using "trace out" as the verb here is not accurate either. You should say "search for evidence" or "look for evidence" instead. And, one presumes, that the department in question is begining an excavation, not a study. Last, but not the least, you might want to read WP:NPA. You should try not to presume biases in other editors. --RegentsPark (comment) 16:21, 30 July 2020 (UTC)

I didn't mention 'is the birthplace ' .I mentioned 'is known as birthplace ' and I know other places are also known as birthplace of Lord Ram. Bhattarai1237 (talk) 16:32, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Well, you can't say "known to be one of the birthplaces of Rama" because a person, even a mythological one, cannot have been born in multiple places. You have to use some mechanism for expressing that this is one possible candidate birthplace. Hence my formulation: "Ayodhyapuri is one of the places thought to be the birthplace of the Hindu deity Rama". Also, the points above which need addressing ("evidences", excavation, etc.). I forgot to add that, since our article Ram Janambhoomi is associated with a specific location, your text appears to say that any evidence found by the digs will support Ayodhya as the birthplace of Ram. I'm pretty sure that's not your intention. Your choices are to drop the explicit reference to Ram Janambhoomi or edit that article so that its focus is on all possible birthplaces, not just the one in Ayodhya. --RegentsPark (comment) 17:58, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
 * I've explained to you why your version is not acceptable. Either see if you can change consensus here, on the talk page, or stop reverting. --RegentsPark (comment) 16:26, 2 August 2020 (UTC)