Talk:Azoospermia/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: 97198 (talk · contribs) 14:33, 13 May 2017 (UTC)

Unfortunately, I am failing this GA nomination since the article still needs significant work to meet the GA criteria. Please feel free to renominate the article once these problems have been addressed. 97198 (talk) 14:33, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
 * The lead section is only three sentences and doesn't summarise the whole article (see WP:LEAD)
 * There is a lack of referencing, including several tags
 * Not all references comply with WP:MEDRS, which favours secondary sources over original (primary) studies and recommends citing reviews from the past five years to ensure information is up-to-date
 * The treatment section is vague and lacking in citations. Ideally it should include specific treatments and especially a clear explanation of TESE since this is the mainstay of treatment for posttesticular azoospermia
 * Medical articles should be accessible to a general audience, so jargon should be avoided or explained (see MOS:MED for tips)