Talk:Béla III of Hungary/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: 3family6 (talk · contribs) 04:14, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:
 * No copyvios detected, just some Wikipedia mirrors.-- 3family6 ( Talk to me   &#124;  See what I have done  ) 20:48, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
 * High quality, polished prose.-- 3family6 ( Talk to me   &#124;  See what I have done  ) 04:37, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
 * B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
 * Follow MOS.-- 3family6 ( Talk to me   &#124;  See what I have done  ) 04:37, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. Has an appropriate reference section:
 * Well formatted reference sections provided.-- 3family6 ( Talk to me   &#124;  See what I have done  ) 04:37, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
 * B. Citations to reliable sources, where necessary:
 * If anything, the article is over-cited.-- 3family6 ( Talk to me   &#124;  See what I have done  ) 04:37, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
 * C. No original research:
 * All content is verifiable and attributable to sources.-- 3family6 ( Talk to me   &#124;  See what I have done  ) 04:37, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * Sticks to major aspects.-- 3family6 ( Talk to me   &#124;  See what I have done  ) 04:37, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
 * B. Focused:
 * Focused on subject, no extraneous material.-- 3family6 ( Talk to me   &#124;  See what I have done  ) 04:37, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * Neutral, balanced discussion, with differing historical perspectives provided where appropriate.-- 3family6 ( Talk to me   &#124;  See what I have done  ) 04:37, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * No instances of edit warring, vandalism, or other disruption since this article was created in 2003.-- 3family6 ( Talk to me   &#124;  See what I have done  ) 20:48, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
 * All licensing checks out. I took the liberty of filling out a few parameters on some images.-- 3family6 ( Talk to me   &#124;  See what I have done  ) 20:48, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
 * B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * Images are useful, relevant, and have appropriate captions.-- 3family6 ( Talk to me   &#124;  See what I have done  ) 20:48, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Overall: An excellent article, ready for FAC in my opinion.-- 3family6 ( Talk to me   &#124;  See what I have done  ) 04:37, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Pass or Fail: