Talk:Béla II of Hungary/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: 3family6 (talk · contribs) 01:19, 14 June 2014 (UTC)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * Article contains a tag in "Early years until 1131"
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * The following images are tagged as needing a US public domain tag:, ,
 * I fixed the tagging issues myself.
 * 1) Overall: Other than these few minor image issues and the tag, the article is good to go.-- &iquest;3fam  ily6  contribs 00:59, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Issue addressed, it is good to go! Nice job, !
 * , I found and added the relevant information. Thank you for your patience. Borsoka (talk) 12:19, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
 * I fixed the tagging issues myself.
 * 1) Overall: Other than these few minor image issues and the tag, the article is good to go.-- &iquest;3fam  ily6  contribs 00:59, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Issue addressed, it is good to go! Nice job, !
 * , I found and added the relevant information. Thank you for your patience. Borsoka (talk) 12:19, 17 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Pass/Fail: